I've even managed to get some testing in on this one

Some of you may remember we ran this track before the season started while many of us were still trying to get a tune ready for Sebring. And, if you were in the same race as me, you might remember that I was slower with mid-range d/f settings than with full downforce

However, in view of the way than fndr and Pete both ate me alive on the straights at Silverstonr I figured it might be worth me seeing just how much time I was losing by going to minimum downforce. Oddly enough, the car was almost as fast around the track with minimum d/f as it was with full d/f, and both configurations were slower than the mid-range set-up. How does that work? I can only guess that it's a quirk of the Forza model.
That leaves me with a dilemma though. Do I go with high downforce for more consistency? Or low downforce so that you don't all steam past on the straight? Decisions, decisions...